Substitution and Satisfaction Atonement

Let’s look at 2 theories of the Atonement.  I’m planning on posting some other theories as well, so stay tuned!

The theories of Penal Substitution and Satisfaction Atonement are two of the most widely accepted explanations for the work of Christ on the cross. While they share many similarities, they also have important differences that impact how we understand the nature of God, the role of humanity in salvation, and the work of Christ on the cross.

Image by https://unsplash.com/@dpreacherdawn

Penal Substitution
Penal Substitution, also known as Substitutionary Atonement, emphasizes the idea that Christ's death on the cross was a substitution for the punishment that humanity deserved because of sin. The idea is that humanity has sinned against a holy God and deserves punishment, but Christ takes the punishment in our place, satisfying God's wrath and making it possible for us to be reconciled to God. This theory is often associated with the Reformed tradition and is seen as a central tenet of evangelical Christianity.

One of the key passages used to support Penal Substitution is Isaiah 53:5-6, which states, "But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to our own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all." Another important passage is 2 Corinthians 5:21, which states, "God made him who had [or, knew] no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God."

Satisfaction Atonement
Satisfaction Atonement, on the other hand, emphasizes the idea that Christ's death on the cross satisfied the demands of God's justice and made it possible for humanity to be reconciled to God. The idea is that humanity has sinned against God and created a debt that must be paid, but Christ pays the debt on our behalf through his death on the cross. This theory is often associated with the medieval theologian Anselm of Canterbury.

One of the key passages used to support Satisfaction Atonement is Romans 3:23-26, which states, "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. God presented Christ as a sacrifice of Atonement, through the shedding of his blood—to be received by faith. He did this to demonstrate his righteousness, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished—he did it to demonstrate his righteousness at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus."

While both theories emphasize the importance of Christ's death on the cross, they differ in their understanding of the nature of that sacrifice. In Penal Substitution, Christ's death is seen as a substitution for the punishment that humanity deserves, while in Satisfaction Atonement, Christ's death is seen as satisfying the debt that humanity owes to God. Both theories emphasize the centrality of Christ's death on the cross in providing forgiveness and reconciliation for humanity, but they differ in their emphasis on the nature of Christ's sacrifice.

Critics of Penal Substitution argue that it portrays God as being vindictive and demanding payment for sin, rather than forgiving out of love and grace. They also point out that the idea of Substitution can be problematic when viewed in the context of abusive relationships, where one party may demand a substitute for a wrong committed against them. On the other hand, critics of Satisfaction Atonement argue that it can portray God as being a creditor who demands payment, rather than a loving God who freely forgives out of grace.  The critics offer their own versions of atonement theory, and we can look at those.  But when you deal with a righteous, holy God, "Who are you O man, to talk back to God" (Romans 9:20)?

Both Penal Substitution and Satisfaction Atonement are important theories of Atonement that help us to understand the work of Christ on the cross.  While both theories have their strengths and weaknesses, it is important to note that they do not have to be viewed as mutually exclusive. Many Christians hold to both theories simultaneously, recognizing that they offer complementary perspectives on the Atonement. In this view, Christ's death on the cross satisfies the demands of God's justice while also serving as a substitution for the punishment that humanity deserves. Ultimately, the most important aspect of the Atonement is not the precise mechanics of how it works, but rather the fact that it was accomplished through the sacrificial love of Christ, who willingly gave his life for the redemption of humanity. As John 3:16 reminds us, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.”

Penal Substitution Passages:
1. Isaiah 53:5-6
2. Romans 3:23-26
3. 2 Corinthians 5:21
4. Galatians 3:13
5. Hebrews 9:28

Satisfaction Atonement Passages:
1. Isaiah 53:11
2. Colossians 2:13-14
3. 1 Peter 1:18-19
4. 1 John 2:2
5. Revelation 5:9

Visit Us On The Web!

www.unlimitedmercy.org

www.facebook.com/unlimitedmercyministries

"Grace, mercy and peace 

from God the Father 

and from Jesus Christ, 

the Father’s Son, 

will be with us 

in truth and love.”

2 John 1:3